What steps will reproduce the problem?
when asking for SRV _xmpp-server._tcp.sipwise.net
Frame 2: 89 bytes on wire (712 bits), 89 bytes captured (712 bits)
Ethernet II, Src: 82:39:8a:f4:df:6d (82:39:8a:f4:df:6d), Dst: 32:31:30:33:38:31 (32:31:30:33:38:31)
Internet Protocol Version 4, Src: 192.168.51.101, Dst: 192.168.200.30
User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: 37559, Dst Port: 53
Domain Name System (query)
[Response In: 3]
Transaction ID: 0x2242
Flags: 0x0100 Standard query
Questions: 1
Answer RRs: 0
Authority RRs: 0
Additional RRs: 0
Queries
_xmpp-server._tcp.sipwise.net: type SRV, class IN
Name: _xmpp-server._tcp.sipwise.net
[Name Length: 29]
[Label Count: 4]
Type: SRV (Server Selection) (33)
Class: IN (0x0001)
3 14:44:24.613564 192.168.200.30 192.168.51.101 DNS 351 Standard query response 0x2242 SRV _xmpp-server._tcp.sipwise.net DNAME sipwise.com CNAME _xmpp-server._tcp.sipwise.com SRV 10 0 5269 sip.sipwise.com NS dns2.sipwise.com NS dns1.sipwise.com A 92.42.136.100 AAAA 2a02:1b8:7:2::dead:c0de A 92.42.136.30 AAAA 2a02:1b8:7:2::f00:ba2 A 92.42.136.31 AAAA 2a02:1b8:7:2::b1a:b1a
We always get:
Jan 24 14:03:50 sp1 (debug) prosody[19041]: adns: Sending DNS query to 192.168.200.30
Jan 24 14:03:50 sp1 (debug) prosody[19041]: adns: Sending DNS query to 192.168.200.30
Jan 24 14:03:50 sp1 (debug) prosody[19041]: socket: new connection established. id: 16968a0
Jan 24 14:03:50 sp1 (crit) prosody[19041]: general: Top-level error, please report:#12/usr/lib/prosody/net/dns.lua:691: table index is nil
Jan 24 14:03:50 sp1 (crit) prosody[19041]: general: #012stack traceback:#12#011[C]: in function 'loop'#12#011/usr/lib/prosody/net/server_event.lua:797: in function </usr/lib/prosody/net/server_event.lua:796>#12#011[C]: in function 'xpcall'#12#011/usr/bin/prosody:376: in function 'loop'#12#011/usr/bin/prosody:407: in main chunk#012#011[C]: ?
Zash
on
There's currently no support at all for DNAME in our DNS library.
Changes
titledns error when resolving domain with DNAME info net.dns does not support DNAME
tags Status-Accepted
Zash
on
This is the same traceback as in #1056 / #976 which is about to be fixed.
I'll convert this into a feature request for DNAME support.
Since Prosody 0.12 now ships with (optional) libunbound integration for its DNS resolution needs, would using that instead of implementing DNAME in dns.lua be acceptable?
What steps will reproduce the problem? when asking for SRV _xmpp-server._tcp.sipwise.net Frame 2: 89 bytes on wire (712 bits), 89 bytes captured (712 bits) Ethernet II, Src: 82:39:8a:f4:df:6d (82:39:8a:f4:df:6d), Dst: 32:31:30:33:38:31 (32:31:30:33:38:31) Internet Protocol Version 4, Src: 192.168.51.101, Dst: 192.168.200.30 User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: 37559, Dst Port: 53 Domain Name System (query) [Response In: 3] Transaction ID: 0x2242 Flags: 0x0100 Standard query Questions: 1 Answer RRs: 0 Authority RRs: 0 Additional RRs: 0 Queries _xmpp-server._tcp.sipwise.net: type SRV, class IN Name: _xmpp-server._tcp.sipwise.net [Name Length: 29] [Label Count: 4] Type: SRV (Server Selection) (33) Class: IN (0x0001) 3 14:44:24.613564 192.168.200.30 192.168.51.101 DNS 351 Standard query response 0x2242 SRV _xmpp-server._tcp.sipwise.net DNAME sipwise.com CNAME _xmpp-server._tcp.sipwise.com SRV 10 0 5269 sip.sipwise.com NS dns2.sipwise.com NS dns1.sipwise.com A 92.42.136.100 AAAA 2a02:1b8:7:2::dead:c0de A 92.42.136.30 AAAA 2a02:1b8:7:2::f00:ba2 A 92.42.136.31 AAAA 2a02:1b8:7:2::b1a:b1a We always get: Jan 24 14:03:50 sp1 (debug) prosody[19041]: adns: Sending DNS query to 192.168.200.30 Jan 24 14:03:50 sp1 (debug) prosody[19041]: adns: Sending DNS query to 192.168.200.30 Jan 24 14:03:50 sp1 (debug) prosody[19041]: socket: new connection established. id: 16968a0 Jan 24 14:03:50 sp1 (crit) prosody[19041]: general: Top-level error, please report:#12/usr/lib/prosody/net/dns.lua:691: table index is nil Jan 24 14:03:50 sp1 (crit) prosody[19041]: general: #012stack traceback:#12#011[C]: in function 'loop'#12#011/usr/lib/prosody/net/server_event.lua:797: in function </usr/lib/prosody/net/server_event.lua:796>#12#011[C]: in function 'xpcall'#12#011/usr/bin/prosody:376: in function 'loop'#12#011/usr/bin/prosody:407: in main chunk#012#011[C]: ?
There's currently no support at all for DNAME in our DNS library.
Changesdns error when resolving domain with DNAME infonet.dns does not support DNAMEThis is the same traceback as in #1056 / #976 which is about to be fixed. I'll convert this into a feature request for DNAME support.
ChangesTraceback should be fixed by https://hg.prosody.im/0.10/rev/fcf42bd7d067
Since Prosody 0.12 now ships with (optional) libunbound integration for its DNS resolution needs, would using that instead of implementing DNAME in dns.lua be acceptable?